.jpg)
Community Resilience Coordination
Harriet
Resilience, coordinated.
Resident self-sufficiency pathways and a shared coordination layer for government, funders, providers and CBOs.
In developmentFive tools.
One pipeline.
Each tool builds a different kind of governance capacity. Together they close the loop from listening to measurement. Tap a tool below to see what it needs and what it feeds.
Community Intelligence · Foundation · Standalone
Nia
Intelligence the community surfaces.
OperationalThe problem it answers
Decisions need to hear from the people they affect most. Traditional methods reach about 15 percent of them. And by the time Census data lands on a desk, the neighborhood has already changed.
What it gives you
Trained, paid Community Civic Researchers reach 70 to 85 percent of targeted residents where traditional outreach reaches 15. Six dimensions read against five disruptors.
Who it serves
- Government
- Philanthropy
- Workforce
- Developers
- Nonprofits and CBOs
- Community advocates
- Researchers
Who gets heard
Traditional outreach
15%
Nia peer research
70 to 85%
Share of targeted residents reached. JST program data.
How Nia protects people
- Nia is designed so the most sensitive information about a person is never collected.
- Nothing is published before the Community Data Stewardship Board has reviewed it.
- We name what systems produced. We do not blame the people who live with the result.
Connected Evidence · Foundation · Standalone
Asa
Where the data becomes the map.
BetaThe problem it answers
Governance readiness requires a connected view of legislation, investment, services, land use and community conditions across time. Existing systems hold these in separate departments, disconnected from history and blind to forecast.
What it gives you
Legislation, investment, services, land use and community conditions in one connected view, read across time from history to forecast.
Who it serves
- Government
- Workforce
- Developers
- Researchers
One view, read across time
The same place, held in a single view from its history to its forecast.
Decision Intelligence · Synthesis · Requires Nia and Asa
Dira
The decision, defensible.
Community testing and evaluationThe problem it answers
Data piles up without synthesis. Leaders face competing priorities with no defensible method, grounded in both community intelligence and resilience evidence, for ranking which intervention builds the most resilience per dollar.
Ranked recommendations built on two foundations: community intelligence and resilience science. Where they diverge, Dira shows both and explains why.
Four criteria, weighed together
Community alignment
Cost
Equity impact
Feasibility
Scenario horizons
5 years10 years20 years
Who it serves
- Government
- Philanthropy
- Workforce
- Developers
- Nonprofits and CBOs
Two foundations, one neighborhood
Illustrative scenario: a neighborhood with the county's highest asthma rates.
Coming next.
Two tools are in development. We name them now and describe them fully when they launch.
See a tool in your context.
A conversation about your place and your decisions. Deeper tool detail is shared in briefings under a nondisclosure agreement.
Request a briefing